<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye, OpenLaszlo</title>
	<link>http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2007/01/06/goodbye-openlaszlo/</link>
	<description>Macs, programming, and technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Yang</title>
		<link>http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2007/01/06/goodbye-openlaszlo/#comment-10133</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 01:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2007/01/06/goodbye-openlaszlo/#comment-10133</guid>
					<description>I have for the past month been using OL. Like any other full-featured GUI system, it is complex and takes time to learn. That said, I'm really liking OL. With no specific issues cited, distaste for XML sounds a bit superficial (and yes, I've done substantial work in CL, Haskell, Scala, and other languages). If you really can't stand it, just use some s-exp-to-XML source translator. :) Semantics are what matters, and OL has terrifically useful abstractions.

(It's also lightyears ahead of JavaFX, which I also happened try.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have for the past month been using OL. Like any other full-featured GUI system, it is complex and takes time to learn. That said, I&#8217;m really liking OL. With no specific issues cited, distaste for XML sounds a bit superficial (and yes, I&#8217;ve done substantial work in CL, Haskell, Scala, and other languages). If you really can&#8217;t stand it, just use some s-exp-to-XML source translator. :) Semantics are what matters, and OL has terrifically useful abstractions.</p>
<p>(It&#8217;s also lightyears ahead of JavaFX, which I also happened try.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zach Beane</title>
		<link>http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2007/01/06/goodbye-openlaszlo/#comment-2597</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://outsidethebox.blankslate.net/2007/01/06/goodbye-openlaszlo/#comment-2597</guid>
					<description>I enjoyed ANSI Common Lisp when I first read it, but the more books I read about Common Lisp the clearer it became that Paul Graham has a quirky style worth some effort to avoid emulating. (Adapting the ideas without the style is handy.)

P. Tucker Withington is one of the folks working on OpenLaszlo, he's an old-school Symbolics Lisp hacker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed ANSI Common Lisp when I first read it, but the more books I read about Common Lisp the clearer it became that Paul Graham has a quirky style worth some effort to avoid emulating. (Adapting the ideas without the style is handy.)</p>
<p>P. Tucker Withington is one of the folks working on OpenLaszlo, he&#8217;s an old-school Symbolics Lisp hacker.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
